1) a.The flipper of a dolphin and the arm of a monkey both show a formality of homologous structures of their forelimbs. A dolphin's fin, however, obviously serves a much different purpose than the arm of a monkey. Dolphins possess a flipper because in an aquatic environment, their flippers can help them navigate through the water and control their speed. A monkey's arm, however, is advantageous because they live in an environment with a variety of trees and branches. Monkeys usually inhabit tropical rainforests, or environments largely covered by trees. They are able to thrive in these environments because their traits allow them to have an advantage.
b. Monkeys have slender, long rms that allow them to grasp tightly to tree branches and move quickly if they need to make an escape from any predators. Another interesting feature about the monkey's arm structure is that, like humans, the ulna and radius are able to rotate, allowing them to face their palms up and down. This structure in monkeys allows them to hang from branches, peel fruit, and even groom other monkeys. However, dolphins have no palms or hands for that matter. Dolphins have pectoral fins, which are the only fins that have bones in them. These bones show similarities to bones found in the monkey arm, wrist, and even hand. These fins help the dolphins stop and turn, sort of like balancing planes. In both the dolphin flipper and the monkey arm, there is a humerus, radius and ulna, metacarpals and phalanges. The structure, though a little distorted, appears almost identical to each other.
c. The ancestor between these two species may have existed over 50 million years ago. Chances are this mammal was terrestrial and required having this bone structure in order to thrive in its environment. The bones within the arm such as the rotating ulna and radius were advantageous as well because it may have helped the ancestor hunt, as it was probably an omnivore.
d.
2) a. Two different species that share an analogous trait are the platypus and the duck. Both of these species have a bill which helps them thrive in an aquatic environment. Another similarity is their webbed feet, which also gives them an advantage in their environment. While the platypus is a mammal, it had evolved long after birds and mammals diverged on their evolutionary path. It was only a matter of time that platypus and ducks evolved similarly after moving back to land from water.
b. The platypus' duck bill acts as more of a snout, and is used to pick up small insects from the bottom of lakes or streams. The significance of their bills is its similarity to the bill of a duck, which serves the same purposes as the bill of a platypus. Both species live on land, but thrive near a body of water such as a pond or lake, which may have drove their convergent evolution. They use their bills to gather food, and filter out excessive water or inedible objects.
c. Studies show that mammals split from their bird and reptile brothers somewhere around 280 million years ago, then 80 million years after that the egg-laying mammals split from normal mammals. So, this proves that platypus had evolved independently, apart from any lineage that belonged to ducks. This also proves that these traits are analogous.
d.
Thursday, February 27, 2020
Thursday, February 13, 2020
Historical Influences on Darwin
1) Charles Lyell had the most positive influence Darwin amongst the five scientists listed. Lyell was a geologist who proposed the theory that the Earth's crust was subject to change in the future as it had all throughout history. Lyell's theories for geology proved to be applicable to species in nature as well, as proposed by Darwin. It was because if Lyell's contributions to geology that Darwin got the influence to propose his likewise theory of evolution.
2) Lyell was the geologist that proposed the theory of Uniformitarianism. This theory proposed that the Earth's crust changes occurred with the same speed and intensity as they occur today.
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/02/4/l_024_01.html
3) In evolution, it is evident how changes within a species don't just take one generation to occur- they take multiple. Individuals do not change, populations do and so evolution occurs between generations. Additionally, change takes too long to be able to observe in one lifetime, but that doesn't mean it does not occur. Likewise to the earth'[s crust, changes within species may have taken thousands of years to happen, yet we can still observe and point out similar and different characteristics within species. Lyell influenced Darwin through his theory of uniformitarianism; the theory showed a correlation to species in the way that a lot of time passes between evolution, and certain traits that are necessary for survival are passed on through generations.
4) I believe it is possible that without Lyell's contribution to geology, Darwin may have not been able to propose his theory of evolution. Darwin was unable to explain the possibility of evolution until the theory of uniformitarianism was proposed, which influenced his thinking. Just as the earth's crust took millions of years to change and shape to the way it is today, the same principle was applied to species by Darwin.
5) The church did not agree with Darwin's theory of evolution because it contradicted religious beliefs. It was believed that all creatures created by God were fixed, and therefore a possibility of evolution did not exist. As a result, Darwin received a lot of backlash and controversy for his publication on evolution- as expected. Darwin's goal was to offer a plausible explanation for the evolution of species.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)